Gio Jang vs Nicol Benesova Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Jang vs Benesova analysis and find out who is favored!
Gio Jang vs Nicol Benesova Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Jang 1 - 0 Benesova
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Jang has won 42.62% of points on their second serve, while Benesova has won 36.28%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Jang, in recent form, has won 56.47% of their opponent's second serve points, while Benesova has won 50%. The same stats for first serve returns are 36.88% and 34.41% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Jang has saved 41.67% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Benesova has saved 44.44% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Jang has won 50% of matches played (W/L 13/ 13), with Benesova winning 28.13% (W/L 9/ 23) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Jang has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 52% (W/L 28/ 26), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 42% (W/L 5/ 7). Benesova has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 37% (W/L 13/ 22), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Jang has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 44.44% of matches (W/L 8/ 10), where as Benesova has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 29.63% of matches (W/L 8/ 19). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Jang winning 1 times and Benesova being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Jang winning 2 and Benesova winning 0. The last match between Jang and Benesova was at the W15 Sharm ElSheikh, 17-10-2023, Q3, Hard with Gio Jang getting the victory 6-3 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:20:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Jang and Benesova have played a deciding set 0 times, with Jang winning 0 times and Benesova 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Jang winning 0, and Benesova 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Jang has played against opponents with an average rank of 98.81 while Benesova has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Jang has won 83% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Benesova has won 57% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Jang has converted 34.48% of breakpoint opportunities, and Benesova has converted 40.91% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Gio Jang
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
18
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
19
Age
Plays
Nicol Benesova
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
Form
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
50% (33-33)
Career Total W/L
29% (26-63)
43% (3-4)
YTD W/L
31% (4-9)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Gio Jang | Nicol Benesova |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 12 | 4 |
Aces (Total) | 3 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 5 |
Avg Match Time | 1:20:0 | 1:20:0 |
1st Serve % | 67% (32/48) | 59% (27/46) |
1st Serve Win% | 78% (25/32) | 52% (14/27) |
2nd Serve Win% | 56% (9/16) | 42% (8/19) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 67% (4/6) | 0% (0/3) |
Return Points W% | 52% (24/46) | 29% (14/48) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-3 6-1 |
Gio Jang
Player
Nicol Benesova
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
59%
(
27 of
46)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
58
Total Points Won
36
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Gio Jang | Nicol Benesova |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 43% (3/4) | 31% (4/9) |
Sets Win/Loss | 40% (6/9) | 30% (9/21) |
Games Win/Loss | 45% (62/76) | 44% (131/165) |
Hard Win/Loss | 50% (1/1) | 30% (3/7) |
Clay Win/Loss | 40% (2/3) | 33% (1/2) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.01 | 0.06 |
Aces Total | 1 | 8 |
DFs per game | 0.21 | 0.19 |
DFs Total | 14 | 27 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 116.14 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 45% (98/220) | 60% (167/280) |
1st Serve W% | 66% (65/98) | 56% (93/167) |
2nd Serve W% | 43% (52/122) | 36% (41/113) |
BPs Won% Total | 34% (10/29) | 41% (9/22) |
Return Pts W% | 44% (107/245) | 39% (106/270) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 50% (2/2) | 33% (1/2) |
Futures W/L | 33% (1/2) | 30% (3/7) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 43% (3/7) | 31% (4/13) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
Deciding Set W% | 100% (1/1) | 75% (3/4) |
1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 100% (3/3) |
1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (3/0) |
1st set L, W | 20% (5/1) | 10% (10/1) |
Gio Jang Recent Matches Played
Before:
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2 | 6-0 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-4 7-5 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-5 6-2 | H2H | |||
QF |
Anna Ureke
Player
Gio Jang
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve %
38%
(
15 of
39)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
5 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
60
Total Points Won
31
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Gio Jang
Player
Zumra Balkan
53%
(
23 of
43)
1st Serve %
40%
(
18 of
45)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
11
87%
(
20 of
23)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
12 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
58
Total Points Won
30
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
QF |
Vanja Gudelj
Player
Gio Jang
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve %
48%
(
24 of
50)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
57%
(
21 of
37)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
41%
(
23 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
64
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Gio Jang
Player
Yoana Radulova
41%
(
36 of
88)
1st Serve %
72%
(
66 of
92)
1
Aces
0
10
Double Faults
7
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
41 of
66)
48%
(
25 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
34 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
39 of
92)
93
Total Points Won
87
|
5-7 6-4 10-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Kamilla Bartone
Player
Gio Jang
48%
(
34 of
71)
1st Serve %
53%
(
46 of
86)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
10
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
54%
(
20 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
37%
(
26 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
45 of
86)
90
Total Points Won
67
|
5-7 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Gio Jang
Player
Nicol Benesova
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
59%
(
27 of
46)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
58
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H |
view more
Nicol Benesova Recent Matches Played
Before:
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
Alina Granwehr
Player
Nicol Benesova
42%
(
18 of
43)
1st Serve %
66%
(
38 of
58)
1
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
4
61%
(
11 of
18)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
42%
(
18 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
60
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Mariam Atia
Player
Nicol Benesova
78%
(
45 of
58)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
59)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Laura Galdano
Player
Nicol Benesova
80%
(
43 of
54)
1st Serve %
62%
(
33 of
53)
0
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
60
Total Points Won
47
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Nicol Benesova
Player
Vasilissa Kupriyanova
54%
(
38 of
70)
1st Serve %
61%
(
46 of
76)
2
Aces
0
10
Double Faults
11
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
34%
(
11 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
8 of
30)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
44%
(
31 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
38 of
76)
77
Total Points Won
69
|
6-3 4-6 10-4 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 4-6 6-1 10-4 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 7-5 4-6 12-10 | H2H |
view more